Sunday, August 16, 2026

Beautiful Wrting Spaces

 


In early July 2002 when I first began my daily writing regimen, I was in Detroit and was to meet my dear friend R. K. Jones for breakfast.  He suggested we meet at the Ten Eyck Room at the storied Dearborn Inn for what called “a big fat breakfast.”  I gladly agreed as this was in my old St. Sarkis Church, Ford Motor Company, and University of Michigan – Dearborn stomping grounds.  I left my parents home with plenty of time to get there and do my daily writing before I was to meet Bob. 

It was a lovely temperate sunny morning in Detroit.  When I got to the Dearborn Inn, I found the lobby empty as it was early on a Saturday morning.  The lobby was well appointed in I will call a Fordian/Detroit version of American Colonial décor.  There was a beautiful desk and chair in the corner that invited me to sit there in write and gave me a perfect view of the entrance so I could easily see when Bob arrived.  I pulled the yellow legal pad from my briefcase, that I was using for my daily writing in those early days, and started writing. 

I have no recall what I wrote that day.  But I remember feeling very good, cool, stylish, sophisticated, basically like a real writer in that beautiful lobby.  I also realized that I liked writing first thing in the morning. 

Upon returning to Manhattan on Monday for work, I decided to stop off at the Barclay Hotel, two blocks from the Colgate offices.  I sat in their beautiful lobby, which was bustling on that workday morning in Midtown, and wrote my page.  Over the next four years, I had written on occasion in the Waldorf, the Inter-Continental, and other beautiful venues in New York.  I didn’t do it every day, but I did when I wanted to recreate that feeling I had that lovely morning in the Dearborn Inn.

When travelling in Latin America, I stayed in lovely hotels, often Inter-Continentals in various cities in the region.  I would often write in their lovely lobbies are at the breakfast table before ordering or hitting the buffet.  There was a 40s or 50s elegant vibe about such.  I am not certain if the writing was any better in these venues, but I simply felt very cool and some wonderful mixture of sophistication, panache, and savoir-faire doing so,    

Upon starting up the daily writing regimen again, I felt that similar pang last week to write in an elegant venue.  Where or where might I do that?  Sure, my own house has that feel due to Judy’s design eye for classic/eclectic, décor.  But I write at home often plus part of the hotel lobby allure is writing in a public space.

The hotels around us all had lobbies, but they were all clean, modern, our not spacious enough.  Then I remembered the Lake Forest Library.  This staid old, domed building, in town had two beautiful rooms.  I recalled that when I first went to the library, I thought both of these rooms would be perfect for daily writing.   It was the Friends Reading Room, however, that resonated more, reached out and said, “you belong in here.”

The room fit the bill perfectly.  I sat and read a bit from one of the two books I have been reading and then set to write my daily page.  It felt really comfortable.

Next stop in town is the Deer Path Inn for “a big fat breakfast,” certainly to write and think of my dear friend R. K.

 

 
    

 

 

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Daily Handwriting Anew

     


This blog began as a monthly newsletter.  On my 49th birthday, I set out keep a journal every day, every day of my 50th year.  The goal was to have it be witty, insightful, and wise reflecting on just about everything.  My goal was to publish and become a notable writer to the point where that would be my full time profession.

It was a great and noble plan but for one thing.

In short, the writing was not good.  There were witty, insightful, and wise moments here and there.  But, the writing, for the most part, was whiney not witty, whiney and not consistently insightful, and lastly, there were only a few pearls of wisdom.  In a given month of writing about 500 words per day, there was maybe 2-4 days of writing (~1000-2000 words) worth sharing.  After a year, I was wondering what to do with all this writing.  I came up with the monthly e-letter based on the monthly letters of Aram J. Kevorkian.  My monthly e-letters began in February 2004.  In that first letter, I wrote:

 

Yet, as with all of my endeavors, there have been unexpected benefits. In this case, this daily writing routine is so worthwhile that I plan to continue with it as long as I can. I had realized over the past several years, that my intellect had grown stagnant and that I was actually having difficulty expressing myself clearly. In writing every day, I have found, or at least imagined which can be just as good, that I am more articulate, clear and fluent. I have found both speaking and writing to be easier than ever. Thankfully, instead of being on the road to senility, I was just losing what I was not using. Upon exercising the mind everyday, surprise, surprise, it began to work better.

 

For this daily writing regimen, I only wrote by hand versus typing.  Why handwriting?  First, I loved pens and wanted to put my collection of fine writing instruments to good use.  More importantly, I had read enough about the mental benefits of handwriting as summarized by Google Gemini:  “Handwriting engages broader brain networks, enhances memory retention, and forces deep conceptual processing, whereas typing offers superior speed, efficiency, and easy digital searchability. [1, 2, 3, 4]”

My intention was to handwrite every day until I was physically unable.

Well, it was an intention.  I dutifully followed that intention until 2009 when I moved the monthly e-letter, that I emailed to family and friends, to this blog.  As my writing improved, I abandoned the notion of one monthly letter and began posting more often.  The more frequent posts tended to be shorter than the e-letters averaging 500-1000 words each.  As I was also using an I-Pad more, I began to gravitate to typing because of the “superior speed, efficiency, and easy digital searchability.”  It was easier to type and post.  Plus, professional writers mostly type, so why not.

In 2009, I posted 13 posts and then over 40 posts a year thereafter with the exception of the drought years 2015 (29), 2016 (18), and 2017 – a lowly 9 posts – as I was learning to be a full-time college professor.  In 2022, I posted 100 times.  This was also a year where I wrote the least number of handwritten pages.

In 2025 (44) and 2026 (12 ytd), my writing productivity dipped.  The decrease was due to two related reasons.  First, I was a little upset by the notion that there was a strong urge in me to use AI to increase productivity.  That really bothered me because I wanted it to be my writing and not Google Gemini’s or ChatGPT’s.   Secondly, because of this desire to not let AI do my writing, I shifted my writing focus to poetry which there was zero urge to use any AI.  I have been writing poetry for many years.  From 2010-2024, I have averaged about 8 poems per year.  Poetry productivity (dang I sound like such an Ops Management professor LOL) has skyrocketed to 44 in 2025 and 53 ytd in 2026. 

On June 1st of this year, I made a conscious decision to restart the daily handwriting regimen.  I miss that practice, that discipline, and the mental clarity it brought.  In just two months, it has paid the same dividends as the first go around.

  There are more topics I want to write about and post here on this blog and I feel lot less urge to save time by having AI do most of the writing.  I will use AI to enhance things and do research, as I have in this post, but I want the writing to be my voice and not just a copy/paste of the output from some data center.

Friday, August 14, 2026

Alter Ego Season 4

Question : Have you watched the first 3 episodes of Reacher season 4 yet? Better question : How many times have you watched the first 3 episodes of Reacher seasons 4? @reacherprimevideo @primevideo #Reacher 

Reacher Season 4 on Amazon Prime began last night.  I am watching the first episode as I type this.  I have written about Reacher twice before:

The first was about the Jack Reacher books by Lee Childs and the first two Reacher movies starring Tom Cruise and the, at that time, upcoming Reacher Series on Amazon Prime.  The second was about the Amazon Prime Series starring Alan Ritchson.  Cruise worked for me, though he didn’t fit the Lee Childs profile/description of the Jack Reacher character.  Basically, it was because Cruise is such a good actor.  Today after watching the first three seasons of the Amazon Prime Series, Ritchson is Reacher to me for sure… and probably everyone else.

The new series got me engaged from the get-go.  It has the feel of Season 2 which until now was my favorite.  In the opening minutes, Reacher was involved in an intrigue deep within the government.  It is the kind of non-stop action the books and the Prime Series is known for.

This whole Alter Ego thing?

It’s real.  Well, it’s a real fantasy.  At my age, I probably can’t even walk as fast as Reacher/Ritchson.  As for hand-to-hand combat, knife fights, or gun fights, it is pretty certain I would fail quickly and miserably.  Why harbor such a fantasy then?

Well, there is a part of me that is still in my late teens where anything is possible and that life of intrigue and fighting had a great lure.  Even then it was a fantasy since I probably never would have made it through Army Ranger, Navy Seal, or whatever branch of military or clandestine service trains the Reachers in the US. 

I never felt is as strong as when I worked in Manhattan.  I was reading a lot of Robert Ludlum back then.  As with Jack Reacher, a lot of the action in the Jason Bourne  stories took place in the urban jungles of big cities.  Taxis, buses, subways, walking the streets, in and out of diners and restaurants and offices where bad guys and maybe the police were looking for you.  One had to be alert, who amongst the masses were suspicious?  One had to be ready to escalate to flight or fight in the blink of an eye.  As I stated in a July 2011 post, Secret Agent Man:  It is pure Walter Mitty.

I looked into the psychology behind why men read and like these books.  This means, simply, that I queried AI.  Google Gemini, my AI of choice,  gave me the following, ready to drop into PowerPoint slides.

 

The Autonomy Fantasy (The Ultimate Loner)

  • Zero baggage: Reacher owns nothing but a toothbrush and travels light.
  • Complete freedom: Men often face heavy work, family, and societal obligations.
  • No compromise: These characters answer to nobody and make their own rules.|


Competence and Mastery

  • Peak capability: Both heroes know exactly how to handle any dangerous situation.
  • Hyper-competent execution: They use logic, survival skills, and physical strength flawlessly.
  • Vicarious control: Reading about them provides a sense of control in an unpredictable world.


Moral Clarity and Retribution

  • Clear justice: The line between good and bad is completely clear.
  • Immediate consequences: The bad guys get punished quickly and decisively.
  • Systemic correction: When laws and bureaucracies fail, these heroes fix the system.


Biological Stress Relief

  • Safe adrenaline: High-stakes action triggers a safe, thrilling rush of dopamine.
  • Controlled endings: The guaranteed resolution lowers cortisol and relieves daily anxiety.
  • Mental reset: The straightforward narrative allows the brain to fully unplug and recharge.

 

Not bad, especially the stress relief segment.  I had not thought of that aspect before and it does make sense.  Never the less, I am sticking with alter ego, fantasy, and Walter Mitty.