Tuesday, June 8, 2021

The Guardian


There has been a lot of buzz about Naomi Osaka in the news lately.  I really did not know much about her nor the details of why she was newsworthy.

I did know she was an athlete and if pressed, I would have narrowed it down to golf or tennis.  I also was aware that she was headline newsworthy because of suffering from depression.  That was it.  I had no intention to delve deeper and write this blog about her.

Jason Gay is a sportswriter for The Wall Street Journal.  I pretty much read everything he writes.  He has a unique and mostly humorous perspective but can also be serious and cerebral if the subject demands such.  I read him for the laughs but am even more appreciative of his craft when he is serious.  He is a very good writer.  On June 2, 2021, his column was titled Listening to Naomi Osaka.  I read it, learned a bit more about the tennis star, and found myself wanting to know more.  I then stumbled across a more extensive article about Osaka in The New Yorker:  Naomi Osaka’s Complicated Withdrawal from the French Open.  I read that as well and here I am writing about it. 

Naomi Osaka is a tennis star.  She is 23 years old and has won four Grand Slam championships, most recently the US and Australian Opens.  She is ranked #1.  She is the first Asian tennis player to have a #1 ranking.  Last year she earned more than $50 million from a combination of tennis prowess and the resulting endorsements.  Her mother is Japanese.  Her father is Haitian.  She was born in Japan but has lived in the US since she was 3 years old. 

In professional tennis, players are required to attend press conferences and are fined if they do not.  Some players that can afford to forego the press conferences and pay the fines.  Are the press conferences necessary?  I don’t know but there are lots of fans who want to hear from the stars of the game.  Do reporters ask pointed questions in a quest to create more newsworthy content, usually controversial, than might otherwise be there?  Certainly, they have a job to do and are trying to advance their own value in their profession.  I suppose it is all part of the culture of celebrity.

To me it matters not that Osaka is a woman, a tennis player, half black, or half Asian.  Race, gender, particular sport, or artistry of any kind all have a role in such a situation.  But, to me, I am more intrigued by the phenomena of being so young and suddenly becoming unbelievably wealthy and incredibly famous.  How does that not go to one’s head?  How does that not mess with one’s head?  How does that not mess with one’s head especially in a sport laden with the pressure of intense competition and an entourage of people dependent on your doing well for their own livelihoods?  I am not sure how well I would handle becoming super wealthy and famous at my current age.  At 23, wow… I couldn’t even imagine how I would have reacted.  We have seen athletes, movie stars, and musicians handle it in so many ways.  Some, spend all their money faster than they ever could have imagined, live large, and become destitute once they beyond their physical peaks.  Others handle it through self-medication and spiral downward as a result.  There are also those that handle it well and become astute managers of their lives and brands.  There are numerous movies of luminaries, fact and fiction, at both extremes.  There is a reason they have remade a Star is Born like 17 times.

When I was 23, I would have had little sympathy for Naomi Osaka.  I would have said, “What are you fricking complaining about… you made $50 million dollars last year. Suck it ip, you have it made!”  Now, I am much more sympathetic and understand that neither wealth nor fame is a guarantee of happiness or a shield from depression and other mental health issues.   

Wishing the best to Naomi Osaka and everyone battling health concerns of any kind. 

This all made me think of Plato’s quote:  Be kind for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.  It also made me recall the E. A. Robinson poem, Richard Cory, and the Simon and Garfunkel interpretation of it.

 

Richard Cory

BY EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON

 

Whenever Richard Cory went down town,

We people on the pavement looked at him:

He was a gentleman from sole to crown,

Clean favored, and imperially slim.

 

And he was always quietly arrayed,

And he was always human when he talked;

But still he fluttered pulses when he said,

"Good-morning," and he glittered when he walked.

 

And he was richyes, richer than a king

And admirably schooled in every grace:

In fine, we thought that he was everything

To make us wish that we were in his place.

 

So on we worked, and waited for the light,

And went without the meat, and cursed the bread;

And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,

Went home and put a bullet through his head.

 

Richard Cory

Simon and Garfunkel

 

They say that Richard Cory owns one half of this whole town
With political connections to spread his wealth around
Born into society, a banker's only child
He had everything a man could want, power, grace and style

 

But I work in his factory
And I curse the life I'm living
And I curse my poverty
And I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be Richard Cory

 

The papers print his pictures almost everywhere he goes
Richard Cory at the opera, Richard Cory at a show
And the rumor of his parties and the orgies on his yacht
Oh, he surely must be happy with everything he's got

 

But I, I work in his factory
And I curse the life I'm living
And I curse my poverty
And I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be Richard Cory

 

He freely gave to charity, he had the common touch
And they were grateful for his patronage and they thanked him very much
So my mind was filled with wonder when the evening headlines read
"Richard Cory went home last night and put a bullet through his head"

 

But I, I work in his factory
And I curse the life I'm living
And I curse my poverty
And I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be
Oh, I wish that I could be Richard Cory

 

Source: https://www.musixmatch.com/lyrics/Simon-Garfunkel/Richard-Cory

Monday, June 7, 2021

Feliz Cumpleanos, Juan Luis Guerra

The HBO Special

 

I was surfing the TV, basically to see what else was on TV.  There were no movies that caught my fancy.  I have had little interest in the news since the denouement of the January 6th insurrection that solidified conspiracy theories in the minds of so many and that basically solidified the divide in the Congress.

I was about to turn the TV off when I saw something on HBO Latino that brought a smile to my face and warmed my heart.  The guide showed “Juan Luis Guerra 4.40: Entre mer y palmeras.”  It was airing later this evening.  I hit “Watch Now” and popped on some headphones to really listen and enjoy.

Juan Luis Guerra?

Never heard of him? 

Juan Luis Guerra has sold over 30 million records (CDs, downloads?).  He is arguably the best musician in the Dominican Republic… maybe ever.

I had not heard of him either until the late 1990s.  That did not surprise me since my musical focus is overwhelmingly Armenian, Turkish, Greek, Arab and Persian.  But, I worked in the Latin American Division of Colgate-Palmolive for about fifteen years.  I travelled throughout the region on business and came to appreciate the culture of many of the countries.  This included language, cuisine, literature, history, art, and music.  I did not master any of it but was a serious dabbler. 

I learned to love Boleros.  There was an article in a local newspaper in Cali, Colombia about the history and popularity of Boleros.  It was the first full newspaper article I ever read in Spanish.  I definitely got the gist of the history.  Boleros are basically love songs and romantic dances with beautiful music and especially poetic lyrics.  Later that evening at a team dinner, I mentioned the article and my interest in exploring the genre.  The next day we visited a music store and I bought a CD of Boleros from the 1950s and 60s.  Basically, it was a collection of classics.  I listen to it several times a year when I am missing my travels and friends.  Bésame Mucho may be the best known Bolero of them all.

When I was in the Dominican Republic once, we were at a company celebration.  There was Merengue music and people were dancing.  I liked the dancing, but it was kind of hyper-frenetic with simply musical phrases repeated over and over again.  It was good house music for dancing, clearly, as the dance floor was full.  But, it was not so good for listening.  Again, in chatting with some colleagues I asked what if this music had folk roots.  The answer, as I suspected, was “of course it originated here in the DR.”  I then inquired what the music sounded like in the early days of this genre.  They were not understanding me, so I related the story of the Bolero and my love for the early recordings.  I asked if it was always this fast and hectic and if not, I would love to hear those versions.  The answer was “ah, ok, you need to listen to Juan Luis Guerra.”  Another visit to a music shop and I had a collection of his greatest hits.  I loved it.

Somehow over the years, I have not seen that CD since we moved to Illinois.  I kind of forgot about Juan Luis, well, until this evening.  This concert is 71 minutes long.  It is set on one of the beautiful beaches of the DR in the late afternoon.  The musicians are simply the best.  The are precise and so talented they make it look easy.  The compositions and arrangements are exquisite.  And his voice, as smooth as ever.  I had not ever really watched him on video, so this was a real treat.

Juan Luis Guerra was born on June 7, 1957, in Santo Domingo.  So, I am watching and writing about him on his 64th birthday.  He is known for his Merengue and Bachata dance music but this HBO special shows his mastery of bolero, baladas, and forays into jazz and rock.  He is a great talent that I am most delighted to have found again. 

Here is one of his songs:  La Llave De Mi Corazon




 

La Llave De Mi Corazón"

La llave de mi corazón
Yeah yeah yeah yeah
Yo escuchaba el otro día
Una emisora radial
Un siquiatra, Doctor Louise
daba consejo matrimonial

Marqué 305 594 1185
(three o' five, five ninety-four eleven eighty-five)
Hey doc, le llamo por una amiga que conocí en un web site
Le pido que, me de solución
pues tiene la llave de mi corazón

Yo soy de Ciudad Nueva y ella es
de San Pedro de Macorís, you know
tierra de peloteros, where Sammy Sosa lives

Le gusta beber jugo de papaya con anís
Y narrar telenovelas, her love is blind as you can see

Le pido que, me de solución
pues tiene la llave de mi corazón


Sólo quiero que me beses como besas tú.

You know I can't stop loving you, baby
I said mambo

Love me, yeah
Love me, yeah

Confirme su autoestima
make a point, you're on the air

Que usted quiere que haga yo
debo aprender español
y bailar con un pie
hasta que me dé su amor

o viajar un año luz
de Saturno a Nueva York
moving in, moving on, merengue bachata y son

Yo pido que, me des solución
pues tienes la llave de mi corazón

Dance!
Dance!
yeah yeah yeah yeah
Dance!

Que usted quiere que haga yo
Tocaré mi conga drums
y me haré un carnet
de poeta y trovador

Desempolvaré mi voz
cantaré 'la vie en rose'
Moving in, moving on
merengue, bachata y son, now

Yo pido que, mes de solución
pues tienes la llave de mi corazón

Sólo quiero que me beses como besas tú.

You know I can't stop loving you, baby

Yo pido que, me des solución
pues tienes la llave de mi corazón

You're so sweet, to me, yeah
You're so sweet
You're so sweet, to me, baby
You're so sweet, to me, baby
You're so sweet
yeah yeah yeah

Yo pido que, me des solución
pues tienes la llave de mi corazón

Sweet to my heart
ehh baby now
Sweet to my heart
Sweet to my heart
Sweet to my heart
yeah yeah yeah yeah
Sweet to my heart
yeah baby

Yo pido que, me des solución
tu tienes la llave de mi corazón

https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/juanluisguerra/lallavedemicorazn.html

 

The Key To My Heart

Yeah yeah yeah yeah

I was listening the other day

To a radio station

A psychiatrist, Doctor Louise

Was giving love advice

 

I dialed 305 594 1185

(three o' five, five ninety-four eleven eighty-five)

Hey doc, I'm calling you because of a friend I met on a website

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

I'm from the New City and she's

From San Pedro de Macorís, you know

A land of players, where Sammy Sosa lives

 

She likes drinking papaya juice with anise

And narrating soap operas, her love is blind as you can see

 

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

I just want you to kiss me like you do.

 

You know I can't stop loving you, baby

I said mambo

 

Love me, yeah

Love me, yeah

 

Confirm your self-esteem

Make a point, you're on the air

 

What do you want me to do?

Should I learn Spanish

And dance with only one foot

Until you give me your love?

 

Or travel a light-year

From Saturn to New York

Moving in, moving on, merengue bachata and sound

 

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

Dance !

Dance !

Yeah yeah yeah yeah

Dance !

 

What do you want me to do?

I'll play my conga drums

And get myself a license

For poet and troubadour

 

I'll dust off my voice

I'll sing 'La vie en rose'

Moving in, moving on

Merengue, bachata and sound, now

 

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

I just want you to kiss me like you do

 

You know I can't stop loving you, baby

 

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

You're so sweet, to me, yeah

You're so sweet

You're so sweet, to me, baby

You're so sweet, to me, baby

You're so sweet

Yeah yeah yeah

 

I ask you to give me a solution

Because you have the key to my heart

 

Sweet to my heart

Ehh baby now

Sweet to my heart

Sweet to my heart

Sweet to my heart

Yeah yeah yeah yeah

Sweet to my heart

Yeah baby

 

I ask you to give me a solution

You have the key to my heart

https://lyricstranslate.com

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Memorial Day Reflections

The Cemetary at Gettysburg

 

This Memorial Day, I again watched the classic 1941 Gary Cooper movie, Sergeant York.  It is the third or fourth time I have watched this movie on Memorial Day.  I even wrote about it back in Memorial Day 2014.

It is classic that it depicts an America of yore, of a man working the land who became a devout Christian and a conscientious objector that managed still to fight while grappling to stay true to his beliefs.  There are many good war movies for a day when we, as a country, remember those that gave their lives for this country.  The men that fight and die in wars are young, they are just beginning their adult lives.  They, as the saying goes, had so much to live for.  Yet, they went to war, they fought for their country, and too many have died doing so.

York did end up killing.  Upon seeing his comrades cut down by machine gun fire he did kill 25 Germans and ended up capturing 132 in the Argonne Battle.  He said he was against the taking of lives as ever but killed the 25 he did to save the lives of many more of his comrades.  It is an amazing history.  While I am sure it was exaggerated some in a movie made in 1941 to help nurture support for World War.  But, the core of the story is most noteworthy for Memorial Day.

The New York Times obituary on September 3, 1964, of York’s passing elaborated on his life after his feats at Argonne.  It seemed a few groups questioned if his exploits were real and only due to his actions.  I learned that York and troubles later in life with back taxes.  The Times article noted the following:

Until this century military history has been dominated by the names of generals and great strategists.  But with the rise of the popular press the common soldier was discovered and adulated.  Sergeant York was the first in this line – a line that was continued by Audie Murphy, Roger Young and a number of other World War II enlisted men. 

I had not really thought of this.  I am not sure I buy into this view.  The heroes of history are indeed the generals, the commanders, the leaders, and strategists.   They are at the forefront because their exploits were documented by historians.  Historians tend to look at things from a more macro perspective to understand how countries and borders, peoples and culture, evolved and developed.  They want to learn from the past to help but the events of today in perspective.  As George Santayana so eloquently stated in 1905, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

I believe that exploits and valor of individuals were always the lore and legend of family and village histories.  I know individual soldiers and sailors kept diaries and wrote memoirs of what it was like to be on the frontlines or working on a war ship.  I believe these personal histories were always “adulated” locally.  We have them in our own family.  I remember my great Uncle Sisag Gavoorian telling me of his time as Antranig Pahsa’s bodyguard in the days of the Armenian Genocide and the fight for independence.  We have a few books from close friends who published he memoirs of their father’s or grandfather’s experiences in the same era.  I believe “the rise of the popular press” amplified the stories and moved the telling and retelling from a family and village level to a national and even international level. 

I do not mean to relegate historians solely to the big picture.  They do tend to study eras and people on all levels.   The want to know how the common man lived on a day-to-day basis.   Though for their broad interest and in-depth studies it is the big names and events, the heroes and villains, the big wins and losses, that make it into the history books we study in grade and high school. 

Me, I am interested in both the macro and micro view.  I watched the heroic exploits of Sergeant York and then Admiral Nimitz and Yamamoto square off against each other in the movie Midway (2019).  It is good to reflect on war, the heroes big and small, and, especially, those who gave their lives on Memorial Day.

Sunday, May 16, 2021

What to Watch?


    

Times change. 

Technology changes.

People adapt at varying degrees.  When an increase in convenience is involved, we tend to adapt to change quickly and rarely look back.  Sometimes, technology provides more options and actually complicates things.

I remember when we got our first television.  I loved it immediately.  Black and white on a ridiculously small screen as it was, it brought stories to life. Be it drama, comedy, or documentaries, I was enthralled.  I loved the children’s shows of the era, Captain Kangaroo, Romper Room, Tom Terrific, and the local shows featuring Soupy Sales, Jingles, Captain Jolly, and Johnny Ginger.  I liked a show called Sky King.  I thought The Three Stooges were awesome and I still do ‘til this day.

Back in the day, there were three channels to choose from:  the ABC, CBS, and NBC local affiliates.  In Detroit where I grew up, we also had access to CKLW the Windsor affiliate of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.  It was a simpler time.  Choosing what to watch was simple.  At any given time, there was a choice of four things to watch.  The schedule was generally fixed and varied only in the event of a monumental breaking news story in which case the three American channels aired the same thing.

Choosing what to watch was easy.  You could consult the handy weekly publication, TV Guide, and tune-in.  If you misplaced the TV Guide and hadn’t memorized the schedule which rarely changed, you surf in that pre-remote way.  You walked over to the TV set, and cycled through the channels and picked whatever caught your fancy.

Into the 1960s, the number of stations began to multiply.  Originally TVs operated in what they called Very High Frequency (VHF).  Some of the expansion was on VHF but the bulk was on Ultra High Frequency (UHF) which all TVs did not receive.  To get UHF, we had to get an add-on box, a precursor of things to come.

The number of channels available exploded with the advent of cable.  Cable had been around since almost the beginning of television.   In 1949, due to poor reception issues rural areas of Pennsylvania, Oregon, and Arkansas, the first cable transmission of television was pioneered to solve the problem.  I never would have guessed cable television began that long ago.

Cable exploded in the 1970s and 1980s.  It was triggered by HBO which began in 1972 and accelerated by ESPN in 1979, and then CNN in 1980.  By 1990, there were hundreds of channels.  Channel surfing became a male couch potato sport.  As Seinfeld said in his eponymic TV show, “Men don't care what's on TV. They only care what else is on TV.”

Video on Demand began in the 1990s but really took off in when Netflix began their online streamline service in 2007.  These days, we are able to watch almost anything we want at any given time.  I certainly get the concept and actually thought I would take great advantage of it.  That has not been the case.  The long and short of it is that I can almost never decide what to watch when virtually everything is available.  There are simply too many choices.   When I feel like watching a movie, it is very rare that I have a particular movie in mind; less than 1% of the time.  When I then try to think of one, my mind is a blank. 

I have several streaming services available to me such as Netflix, Peacock, Tubi, Pluto, Amazon Prime, HBO Max, and Xfinity.  I can certainly browse the libraries of each for movies, series, and documentaries.  I have indeed tried to do that.  Again, it is overwhelming.  It shouldn’t be but for some reason it is.  This is exactly what happened when I used to go to video rental stores (remember those?).  Unless I had an actual movie in mind, it took me forever to make a selection. 

So, I resort to seeing what is actually “on.”  I flip through the channels until I see something of interest.  The only choice then is do I watch the movie in progress or restart it?  This seems to work for me, as low tech and old school as that sounds.

In recent years, there are series produced by these and other streaming networks or services.  They are very popular folks tend to binge watch them (though the buzz on binge watching seems way down from my perspective).  We tried that and watched a few of these.  Frankly, they were too long.  None of the episodes came to any real closure but more so left things unresolved enough so people would watch the next episode.  This is the motivation for binge watching. 

Luckily, E! is showing all the Harry Potter movies over and over again.  As I am a huge fan, there is always something “on” this weekend.

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Our Tolegian Corner

    We have artwork in our house.  We like what we have but our small collection is much greater in sentimental value than appraisal value by at least ten thousand-fold.   Not surprisingly, most of our artwork is Armenian themed.

One of the first pieces I ever bought was Ladies Baking Lavash by Manuel Tolegian.  It is only a print, but it was perhaps the first times a work of art spoke to me.  I first saw it in my in-laws house and liked it very much as did my wife. 

It is a beautiful painting of nine women on a screened-in porch baking lavash.  The women are all seated on the floor and have quite a production line going.  They are baking the bread in a tonir oven, the most traditional way.  The setting is on a farm.  Perhaps in Armenia?  Perhaps in Fresno?  The woman drinking water in the foreground always captures my attention.  The colors Tolegian used are from the same earth tone pallet as Mardiros Saryan.

We were living in our first house.  There must have been an article in either The Armenian Weekly or Ararat Magazine about Manuel Tolegian’s passing.  Upon reading about him, I thought to send a sympathy note to his wife.  I do believe I wrote the editor of the publication to get an address.

Araks Tolegian wrote me back and we exchanged a few letters.  I expressed my admiration for the Ladies Baking Lavash and she told me that there were prints still for sale.  I immediately bought one.  We had it framed at a local gallery and frame shop owned by the Zennedjian family.  The painting has been on our walls our homes ever since.

Manuel Jirair Tolegian was born on October 18, 1911 in Fresno, CA.  He passed away in Sherman Oaks, CA on August 4, 1983.  He was a childhood friend of William Saroyan and wrote some of the music for Saroyan’s play “Time of Your

Tolegian with Jackson and Charles Pollack
in 1930 Tumblr


Life.”  He moved to Los Angeles to study art at the Manual Arts High School where he met and became friends with Jackson Pollack.  Tolegian and Pollack went to New York to continue their education at The Art Students League.  They traveled back and forth from NYC to LA several times together. 

There was an article in the March 4, 1941 New York Times announcing a one man show of Tolegian’s work at the Associated American Artists Galleries on Fifth Avenue.  In the short article, William Saroyan was quoted: 

A number of things distinguish Tolegian’s work.  For one thing, he has natural strength which is all over the canvas.  It isn’t the consequence of subject matter or style; it is inevitable, out of the identity of Tolegian himself.  As I see it, it is a human strength.  That is, a strength notable and exceptional for its expansiveness and gentility.

The article stated, “Mr. Saroyan adds with whimsical appreciation:

He could paint a fly on a table and make it look sad and related to the matter of human life.  You would suspect the fly knew about things, and of course  in the painting the fly would.

Per Wikipedia, “painting Armenian Ladies Baking Lavash by Armenian American artist Manuel Tolegian was selected by U.S. President Gerald Ford to hang in the White House Bicentennial.”

When Araks Tolegian sent us the print of Ladies Baking Lavash, she also sent us two postcards of Tolegian’s still lifes.  We framed and hung those as well.  One of them was Peaches and Demitasse.  Recently, my wife found a much larger framed version of the Peaches and Demitasse on a local Facebook Marketplace.  She immediately bought it and have hung it on the same wall as Ladies Baking Lavash.

Someday, I would love to see the originals.

Farm Scene americangallery.wordpress.com


 

 

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Much Ado About T-Shirts

 


     For many years, I have been musing on this topic or that and meandering about searching for topics esoteric, obscure, and plain old banal.  You would think in all those years I would have already written about something as lame as t-shirts, perhaps even several times. 

While I have referenced undershorts in a few letters, the favorite of mine being Changes and Armenians Invented Clothes, I have not broached the subject of t-shirts.  Well that ends here, today.

Why t-shirts and why now?

The answer is simple:  Facebook.

Huh?

Yes, Facebook. 

I have been inundated with a flurry of ads in the past few weeks for t-shirts. 

It seems that there are some remarkable breakthroughs made regarding this humble yet important and, sometimes, fashionable part of our wardrobes.  Through the use of better sewing technology, new varieties cotton, better designs, and, certainly, the crazy advances in both polys and esters which we all know are multiplied tenfold when melded into the miracle of polyesterization.  It is mind-boggling.

Actually, I am not sure if any of this is remotely true.  Nevertheless, it has to be from what I am reading in all these t-shirt advertisements from companies I have never heard of.  They are all claiming that their revolutionary t-shirts are softer, fit better, last longer, shrink less if even at all, and give the wearer an amazing look and feel. 

They all claim their t-shirts are less boxy and, golly, aren’t we all tired of boxy old-fashioned t-shirts.  Silly me, I always thought form fitting was not flattering to my one-pack ab.  They go on to say that the design makes bigger guys look slimmer and slimmer guys more… bigger.  (Some of you no doubt are wondering if these shirts have the same kind of effect on the female.. um… pectorals.  There was no mention of this though I am certain their scientists are hard at work on this as I write these words.)

I am certain that some kind of magic technology is happening here.  This is like the thermos bottle, one of the great inventions of mankind, which keeps hot things hot and cold things cold.  Both the thermos bottles and this new breed of t-shirts do this with no microchips or wires of any kind.  This is crazy science.  In medieval times, scientists working on things like this would have been labelled witches or wizards and burned at the stake.

Other than making bigger guys look trimmer, and scrawny guys look more buff, the ads all imply that everyone buying and wearing them will feel better about themselves.  I imagine the t-shirts will grow hair on bald heads, make grey hair darker, and make your children do better in school. 

How much are these t-shirts running for?  The firm that seems to advertise the most offers a variety of multi-packs.  Their 3-pack has a list price of $62.97 but has been marked down to $43.99 ($14.66 a shirt) and even offers an option to buy with four interest free installments of $11.  Never thought about buying t-shirts on installment. 

Of course, I looked on Amazon.  Oh my, there are countless offers from names you have heard of like Hanes, Jockey, Gildan, Carhartt, and Champion to names you have never heard of like Uni Clau, Goodthreads, and Pegeno.  There is also the Amazon Essentials Brand that is shaking up the clothing business.  The prices range from $3.80 for a basic Hanes to $20+.  The materials range from 100% cotton to cotton/poly blends to all synthetic materials.  There is a dizzying array that is hard to choose if you are just browsing. 

These ads that I have seen on Facebook makes it easy to buy t-shirts, that are probably good shirts, while avoiding the dizzying array on Amazon.  One of the companies True Classics has adopted the charitable donation model pioneered by Tom’s Shoes and then Bombas Stockings. 

Until this barrage of t-shirt ads, t-shirts were pretty much a commodity, practically a throwaway item, in my view.  I classified them in two categories.  There are t-shirts that are, basically, undergarments.  Unlike the 1950s, this class of t-shirts are only worn under other shirts, sweaters, or sweatshirts these days.  They used to come in any color and material you wanted as long as it was white and cotton.  Then there is the class of t-shirt that is the only shirt worn.  The primary top t-shirts are varied in both color and color.  They could be cotton, polyester, or a cotton/polyester mix and come in henna color you might imagine.

This is much ado about t-shirts.  Other than perhaps buying some Amazon Essentials tees when I am next in need, I probably will not alter my t-shirt buying habits.  For t-shirts that are the only shirt worn, I seem to be biased to those with University of Michigan logos.