For some reason lately, I have been thinking about the
great Japanese engineer and quality improvement expert Genichi Taguchi. I have been thinking about him a lot more
than usual. I have met the man a few
times back in the 1980s when he was a significant and influential advisor to
the auto industry. I have been thinking
about his work and especially a measure that he touted, the signal-to-noise
ratio, which is the ratio of the mean to the standard deviation. Taguchi used the signal-to-noise ratio to allow
designed of experiments to evaluate multiple response variables as one.
Rest easy, this piece is not a feeble attempt to explain
the signal-to-noise ratio to those of you that don't give a whit about it.
In thinking about the Taguchi, I wondered if he was still
with us. I thought he had passed on
several years ago. So, I did what I do
these days when the slightest notion or query about any old thing pops into my
head... I googled his name. I was
surprised to learn that he passed away on June 2nd of this year. He was 88 years old. I was at some of his first lectures at Ford
Motor Company. I was selected by my
section supervisor to attend these lectures for two reasons. First, I was a math major. Second, he had to send someone and I was the
only person who showed any interest.
Honestly, I did not understand very much in those first lectures do to a
combination of Dr. Taguchi's very thick accent and the, at that time, very
confusing nature of the subject.
I will still write about the signal-to-noise ratio. I will post it on my business blog: http://cr-supplychain.com/blog/. The reason I am blogging about this here is
that this thinking about the great man only to find that he had recently passed
away made me think of the subconscious, of serendipity, of being psychic, and
of having premonitions. I am not saying
that I possess any of these traits or skills.
I am not even suggesting that I was somehow channeling the passing of
Dr. Taguchi two and a half months after he actually passed on. I am not sure I believe in any of these
things. By the same token, the
compliment of that last sentence is that I might believe in these things. I do believe there is a non-zero probability
that premonitions or whatever you want to call them happen. Just don't ask me for what that probability
is.
Part of not being firmly on one side or the other is that
there no definitive data one way or another.
Another part is that I am a statistician. Statisticians tend to see
things in more shade of gray than normal, regular, folk. We may view life in more shades of gray than
even Ruta Sepetys. This whole question
of being psychic and having premonitions is definitely gray. I know people who will read this and write me
that premonitions and other psychic phenomena are very real. I would be much more inclined to believe them
if they ESPed me. Certainly, there are
others who will discount me for even suggesting any of this might actually be
real.
What is a premonition?
We all have them. The most common
is that we are thinking of an old friend or acquaintance and they call that day
or the next. It is serendipitous enough
that our first words are something akin to "oh my God, I was just thinking
about you, honest." How often does
this happen? If you know three hundred
people that you are in touch with at least once every year or so and you think
about them at least twice that much, what is the probability that you think of
them the same day that they call? What
is the probability distribution for this happening in general? What level of probability would constitute
something extraordinary is happening? I
am sure there are people who have actually estimated such things. I might actually do some research or even attempt
some calculations for a second installment on this topic.
For me, if there is such a thing, it would be about people
communicating with each other subconsciously in such a subtle way that it would
be easy to assume it was just chance. If
we could really sense things or the actions of others, it might be possible to
sense things that we could use for our personal advantage. If this is remotely true, than those with
that gift are a very closed mouthed group.
Thinking about an old friend and then having them call is one thing,
being able to sense that Warren Buffet is about to make a huge investment is
entirely different. Maybe you have to
know and be connected with the other person for this to actually work.
I do not think these premonitions happen to me any more
than they do for anyone else. But that
is more hunch than fact. How would one
go about even measuring this. I could
write down every time I think of someone and than note if they called. This would work, but I am pretty certain I
would not even last a day at this exercise.
I would get bored quickly with such a tedious task.
To close this, let's conduct a little experiment shall
we. I am thinking of one of you that
might possible read this. If we are
indeed channeling or whatever we might call it, I will expect a communication
from you via that mode I am thinking about on the day that I am thinking
about. If that happens, I will not be
surprised and say "Oh my, you won't believe this, I was just thinking
about you."
Mark
ReplyDeletesorry to learn from your Blog that Taguchi passed away recently. Many years ago, I was working with my friend Anand who has actually met Taguchi. I have not. He would come to Minneapolis to consult with Pillsbury.
Taguchi's methods were more realistic. Since you said that you are a statistician, that makes me cautious. I had learnt the old Box-Benkins methods first. But I found Taguchi's methods to make more sense in an industrial context.
Hope someone is carrying his ideas forward.
Only in Japan, they celebrate quality control. They have a holiday for an American named Deming.
Quality at any cost.
Ram
If both persons are thinking about each other at the same time, do they cancel out of any, "OMG, I was just thinking about you!"
ReplyDeleteI was thinking about you and wondered if you had written anything new on your blog, so I opened my computer to your blog and ...An article on Premonition or Chance. The day I opened and read your article, I wanted to respond, but I couldn't because I must have been a robot lol. So here I am days later and my comment is published. Now why is that?